Antinomianism – P. G. Mathew

Originally from here.

Today I will speak on the subject of antinomianism. Antinomianism comes from two Greek words: anti means against and nomos means law. So antinomianism means against the law, against God’s moral law. It means lawlessness.

You know, Americans are a people who are interested in making life easier, and so we devise technologies that assist us in our pursuit of happiness and our pursuit of easy living. Americans like anything that is made easy. Dieting made easy means you can eat all you want and be slim. Exercise made easy means you can discipline your body while sleeping. Without sweating you can accomplish the benefits of physical exercise. So also we have salvation made easy, and Americans enjoy this salvation made easy. In other words, you can go to Heaven while sinning. You can have your cake and eat it too. So churches are being packed with people who love this salvation made easy, and that is our subject today. Antinomianism, lawlessness is salvation made easy. The sales pitch is this, that you lose nothing while you are on your way to Heaven. You can be lawless and go to Heaven.

Now you may have heard of legalism. Legalism is the opposite of antinomianism. Legalism says that salvation is based on human good works apart from faith and apart from grace. Jesus condemned this view of the Pharisees. Paul condemned this view of the Judaizers, especially in the books of Galatians and Romans. But antinomianism says salvation is based on faith in God and therefore obedience to God’s law is not necessary at any stage in a Christian’s life. So these are two opposite ideas, legalism and antinomianism, which are totally opposed to the teaching of the Bible.

Antinomianism is not new. Throughout history you find antinomians who passionately violated the law of God. Some even worshiped the devil. Such people were called by various names, like Cainites and Satanites. They literally gloried in their sin. Martin Luther first used this expression, antinomianism, to refer to the views of his friend, Johannes Agricola, in the sixteenth century. Agricola taught that the moral law of God was in no way binding upon those who are justified by faith alone. So Johannes Agricola said Christians are entirely free from the moral law of God.

Of course, the New Testament anticipated this error, and dealt with it in several places. The New Testament teaching is that a Christian is freed from the law as a way of salvation, and in this sense a Christian is not under the law. Certainly that is true. No man can keep the whole law in order to be saved, because man is a sinner and so is incapable of keeping the law. However, the moral law of God continues to be our guide to holy conduct. A Christian is justified by grace through faith alone. He is indwelt by the Holy Spirit, who enables him now to obey the law of God. This keeping of the law of God by a Christian is the evidence that he is justified and saved by grace through faith alone in Jesus Christ.

Now there are several Scriptures we should look at that deal with this error called antinomianism, or lawlessness. Jude 4 says “For certain men whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are godless men, who change the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.” So you see that in the New Testament itself this heresy was manifested.

James also deals with this heresy in James 2, beginning with verse 14: “What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds?” Notice the claim. Any man can claim, I am saved, I am justified. You see that again in 1 John several times. People were making this claim that they were saved, that they were Christians, that they were justified. But James says, “Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to him, ‘Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed,’ but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead. But someone will say, ‘You have faith; I have deeds.’ Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do. You believe that there is one God? Good! Even the demons believe that and shudder.” In other words, the faith of the antinomians, faith without good works, is the faith of the demons.

Look at Galatians 5. In Galatians St. Paul argues for our Christian freedom, and yet he makes this point in the thirteenth verse of Galatians 5: “You, my brothers, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature.” You see, people were saying, “We are free! We agree with you, St. Paul, that we are not under law, we are under grace. We are justified by grace through faith alone, and therefore we ought to have no dealings with the moral law of God. The moral law of God is not our guide to holy conduct. In fact, we probably must demonstrate that we are orthodox, that we believe in salvation by grace through faith, by violating God’s law. Then we will truly pride ourselves on being people who are saved by grace through faith!”

In 1 Corinthians 5 you notice there was a man living an incestuous life. He was living with his father’s wife but the church was not dealing with this person because the church was probably influenced by this heretical idea that if you are saved by grace through faith alone, then it doesn’t matter what you do with your body. So we read, “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife.” The church was not upset with that. The church was not dealing with it. Why? Look at 1 Corinthians 6:12. There was a slogan going about in the Corinthian church: “Everything is permissible for me.I can do everything. I don’t have to concern myself with keeping of God’s moral law. I am justified by grace through faith alone. Of course, St. Paul condemned that nonsense.

Turn to 1 John 1. The apostle John referred to this antinomian heresy in verse 6: “If we claim to have fellowship with Him yet walk in the darkness, we lie, and do not live by the truth.” These people were claiming that they were saved by grace through faith alone, and that they were not under law anymore. They were now free, and they could do anything they wanted with their bodies – it didn’t matter.

And in 1 John 3:7 John says, “Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray.” Antinomianism is not the way of God. It is wandering away from the straight path that God has revealed to us, which is the path of righteousness. “He who does what is right is righteous, just as He is righteous. He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.” You see, there were teachers and leaders in New Testament churches who were heretics. They taught this “salvation made easy” idea, that you can go to Heaven while sinning to your heart’s content as you live in this world.

1 John 2:18-19 says, “Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us.” In other words, antinomians are antichrists. These were antinomian leaders, antinomian teachers, and they were kicked out. They were disciplined. They were sent out from the church of Jesus Christ in order that the church be kept pure. Antinomianism is a heresy.

Peter says the same thing in 2 Peter. 2 Peter, like Jude, was written to combat this heresy of antinomianism. In 2 Peter 2:19 we read: “They promise them freedom, while they themselves are slaves of depravity – for a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him.” This was the essence of their teaching. No wonder American churches, especially those of evangelical persuasion, are filled with people. The preachers are telling them, “You can be a Christian and sin.” Everybody likes that, you see. There is pleasure in sin. Everyone is interested in it.

You find this idea of antinomian teaching again in the book of Revelation. Revelation 2:2 says: “I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked men, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false.” These were leaders who were going from church to church, teaching this antinomian heresy, this nonsense of salvation made easy. Look at Revelation 2:14: “Nevertheless, I have a few things against you: You have people there who hold to the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to entice the Israelites to sin by eating food sacrificed to idols and by committing sexual immorality.” These teachers were teaching it was okay to sin to your heart’s content. You were still saved. Jesus Christ, the Lord of the church, opposes that teaching.

In his book, Concise Theology, J. I. Packer distinguishes between various types of antinomianism. First, he says, there is dualistic antinomianism. What is dualistic antinomianism? It is based on the Greek idea that man is body and man is spirit, but man’s body, being matter, is evil. Salvation is salvation of the soul. There is not going to be any resurrection of the body, because the body is evil. Therefore it doesn’t matter what you do with your body and you may sin to your heart’s content. Go ahead! You are saved anyway. This idea is based on the dualistic thinking of the Greeks.

Secondly, Dr. Packer speaks about Spirit-centered antinomianism. It says, “What matters is not what the Scripture tells me. I am a spiritual person, filled with the Holy Spirit. I am above the law of the Scripture. I am led by the Spirit, and the Spirit overrules the Scripture. The Spirit can even contradict the Scripture. I am a spiritual Christian, and I am led by the Spirit. I do what the Spirit tells me, and I don’t worry about the Holy Scriptures.” That is the idea. Probably this is what the man in 1 Corinthians 5 said, because the Corinthian church took pride in being charismatic, and some charismatic Christians go astray in this fashion. The Holy Spirit is the author of the Holy Scriptures, and the Spirit leads us into truth. The Holy Spirit will never contradict the Scripture. In fact, He enables us to understand and obey the Scripture. So true spirituality leads us to obey the law of God, not defy it.

Thirdly, there is liberal antinomianism. Liberals are people who reject the Scriptures as God’s Word. They have subscribed to the relativism of the secular world, saying that there are no absolutes and that there is no God. Thus, they say, there is no absolute law of God. So they deny the Scripture and live as they please. That is liberal antinomianism.

Fourthly, there is situational antinomianism [or, “love”-centered antinomianism]. Situational antinomianism says that what you need is the inner motive and intention of love. As long as you intend to love, you may disregard the law of God. It says, “Yes, I love my neighbor’s wife, so I can disregard the commands that say, ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery’ and ‘Thou shalt not lust.’ I can have an affair, and there is no question about it.” Well, this type of idea misrepresents what love according to the Scripture is. It is pure nonsense. True love fulfills God’s law by the power of the Holy Spirit.

Fifthly, there is so-called “Christ”-centered antinomianism. The idea is that a believer is united with Christ, he is in Christ, and his life is hid with Christ in God. God sees Christ, who kept the law perfectly, and God sees no sin in the believer because God sees him through Jesus Christ. So the believer is therefore able to violate God’s law. It makes no difference to God. But that is all pure nonsense, isn’t it?

Sixthly, there is a modern type of antinomianism which I call “Jesus is Savior” antinomianism [or, the no-lordship gospel]. People say that in order to be saved, you must receive Jesus as your Savior, but you do not have to receive Him as Lord. So, as a “saved” Christian, you need not obey the Lord Jesus Christ. Your salvation is secure as long as you once upon a time received Jesus Christ as Savior by faith. No! That’s not what the Bible says. “If you confess with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9). If you are truly repenting before God, you say, “I am sorry that I disobeyed You, and I now submit myself to your Son, Jesus Christ, who is the Lord of all.” But this type of “Jesus as Savior” nonsense is extremely appealing to Americans, and many, many churches are packed with people who believe this nonsense. They would say this: Keeping the moral law is at no stage necessary for a Christian.

Let me tell you, all forms of antinomianism are condemned by the Scriptures and condemned by God. Turn to 1 Corinthians 6:9-11. What is God saying to people who practice antinomianism? “Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” That’s what the Bible says. Let’s turn to Revelation 21:8. What does it say? “But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars – their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.”

The Bible condemns it. The apostles condemn it. Jesus Christ condemns it. Antinomianism is a heresy that must be rejected. We are saved by grace through faith alone and we are saved and indwelt by the Holy Spirit in order that we may keep God’s moral law. And keeping the moral law is the sure evidence that a Christian is justified by grace through faith alone. May God help us not to believe in antinomianism, but to believe in the true doctrine of the Holy Scriptures. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This Is Love: Faith in the Cross and Keeping God’s Commands

THIS IS LOVE: not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins. Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and His love is made complete in us.                                              –1 John 4:10-12

Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and everyone who loves the father loves his child as well. This is how we know that we love the children of God: by loving God and carrying out His commands. THIS IS LOVE for God: to obey His commands. And His commands are not burdensome, for everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.                                                                                                                             –1 John 5:1-5

This generation does not know what it means to love. Good thing the Bible actually says it twice: “this is love” (1 John 4:10) and “this is love” (1 John 5:3). Scripture tells us exactly what love is, where it comes from, what its parameters are, what its nature is, what its objects are, and how it is expressed. The reason for this is extremely important: it is a mark of salvation, without which the apostle John says, nobody can really know for sure if they’re saved from Hell: “Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love” (1 John 4:7-8). In other places of Scripture, the phrase “born of God” is an expression of salvation, as in the case of being “born again” or being “born of the Spirit” to a new life of faith in Christ and holy living (John 3:6-7). Conversely, the apostle Paul writes of the Day of Judgment, “When the Lord Jesus is revealed from Heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ” (2 Thessalonians 1:7-8).

Real Christians are born of the Spirit into a new life of righteousness and holiness, obedience to God’s commands, and obedience to the Gospel, which is faith in the cross as a sacrifice for our sins, for our justification and forgiveness, and a new life in which the morals of Christ are lived out honestly and sincerely (Matthew 5-7, etc).

The secular concept of love always removes these conditions:

1. It does not have the Holy Spirit.

2. It is not holy.

3. It is not related to God’s commands.

4. It does not involve obedience to the Gospel (faith in the cross).

5. It is not related to the commands of Christ in the New Testament.

Worldly, secular concepts of love involve temporary, natural affection, but they do not last: they are temporary and natural…of the flesh, and not from the Holy Spirit of God, who is love (1 John 4:8; Romans 5:5). For example, drinking buddies sometimes take care of their friends when they are very DRUNK…they “care” for them by holding up their heads above the toilet as they are barfing out their guts. But these drinking buddies won’t advise them to stop drinking their wits out, or mention they are degrading themselves in trashy behavior, they won’t warn them against liver damage or alcohol poisoning, or tell them about rehab centers for alcoholism. That is not Biblical Christian love. Obviously.

Friends Barfing TolietWorldly, secular concepts of love are always SECULAR in that they bear no point of reference to the BIBLE or JESUS. Secular, natural love is always centered around what is NATURAL or EARTHLY.

Secular love takes on a “non-judgmental,” politically correct idea: at least when it comes to morals and religion. But nobody is truly non-judgmental. If you go out and live in the world, you will find people are just as judgmental as Christians are, only with their own set of standards. Instead of Christians judging people about idols, blasphemy, hate, adultery, fornication, drunkenness, lying, and covetousness–friends and associates and family members of a worldly spirit will judge people on their economic status, their physical appearance, their personal interests and hobbies, and whether they are funny enough to keep company with…and it always tends to favoritism.

The real Christian makes righteous judgments (John 7:24).

The worldly person judges people based on whether they will contribute to the pursuit of a fun life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, eating, drinking, and over all, being merry…and then they die and go to HELL FOR ETERNITY.

Jesus on the CrossComments on 1 John 4:10: “THIS IS LOVE”

God loved us first, and in the circumstances in which we lay: Herein is love (unusual unprecedented love), not that we loved God, but that He loved us, 1 John 4:10. He loved us, when we had no love for him, when we lay in our guilt, misery, and blood, when we were undeserving, ill-deserving, polluted, and unclean, and wanted to be washed from our sins in sacred blood…That He gave us His Son for such service and such an end. (1.) For such service, to be the propitiation for our sins; consequently to die for us, to die under the law and curse of God, to bear our sins in His own body, to be crucified, to be wounded in His soul, and pierced in His side, to be dead and buried for us (1 John 4:10); and then, (2.) For such an end, for such a good and beneficial end to us–that we might live through Him (1 John 4:9), might live for ever through Him, might live in Heaven, live with God, and live in eternal glory and blessedness with Him and through Him: O what love is here!                     –Matthew Henry

And that He was thereby induced to give His Son to be a propitiation for our sins. No: we were enemies to God, and yet Christ died for our ungodly souls. (See Romans 5:6-11, and the notes there.) It was God’s love, not our merit, that induced Him to devise means that His banished might not be expelled from Him.               –Adam Clarke

Comments on 1 John 5:3: “THIS IS LOVE”

How we may learn the truth of our love to God–it appears in our holy obedience: When we love God, and keep His commandments, 1 John 5:2. Then we truly, and in Gospel account, love God, when we keep His commandments: For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments; and the keeping of His commandments requires a spirit inclined thereto and delighting herein; and so His commandments are not grievous, 1 John 5:3. Or, This is the love of God, that, as thereby we are determined to obedience, and to keep the commandments of God, so His commandments are thereby made easy and pleasant to us. The lover of God says, “O how I love Thy law! I will run the way of Thy commandments, when thou shalt enlarge my heart” (Psalms 119:32), when thou shalt enlarge it either with love or with thy Spirit, the Spring of Love.”                                                                                                               –Matthew Henry

This the love of God necessarily produces. It is vain to pretend love to God while we live in opposition to His will…To love Him with all our heart, and our neighbour as ourselves, are not grievous–are not burdensome; for no man is burdened with the duties which his own love imposes. The old proverb explains the meaning of the apostle’s words, Love feels no loads. Love to God brings strength from God; through His love and His strength, all His commandments are not only easy and light, but pleasant and delightful. On the love of God, as being the foundation of all religious worship, there is a good saying in Sohar Exod., fol. 23, col. 91: “Rabbi Jesa said, how necessary is it that a man should love the holy blessed God! For he can bring no other worship to God than love; and whoever loves Him, and worships Him from a principle of love, him the holy blessed God calls His beloved.”                                              –Adam Clarke

—–

Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the Law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the Law.                                                          –Romans 13:8-10

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Protection Against Fear and Worry – Derek Prince

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Derek Prince as a Prophetic Mentor

Derek Prince
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Worship – Derek Prince

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How to Be Delivered – Derek Prince

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Exercising Spiritual Gifts – Derek Prince

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Donald Gee (1891 – 1966) – Tony Cauchi

Originally from here.

Donald GeeDonald Gee is described by one biographer as pastor, author, educator, conference speaker, editor and ecumenist. A true Pentecostal statesman! Born in London in 1891, he was converted in 1905 when Seth Joshua, the Welsh revivalist held evangelistic meetings at Finsbury Park Congregational Church. He joined a Baptist church with his mother in 1912 and he was baptized in the Holy Spirit in March 1913.

When the war broke out in 1914 he registered as a ‘conscientious objector’ to military service and was sent to work on a farm in Buckinghamshire which he found to be ‘a divinely arranged college that provided deep preparation of spirit, soul and body for the years of strenuous ministry that, all-undreamt-of, lay ahead.’ He considered these times ‘some of the most richly formative of a lifetime.’

A year later he moved to another farm where he led a small Pentecostal fellowship and then, after the war ended in 1918, he returned to London. In 1920 he accepted a call to the pastorate of a small chapel in Leith, near Edinburgh, Scotland. The church grew and Bonnington Toll Chapel was built and became his place of ministry for 12 years to come. Many great Pentecostal pioneers like the Jeffreys brothers, W.F.P. Burton Burton, Howard Carter and Smith Wigglesworth ministered here. In 1921 he attended the International Pentecostal convention in Amsterdam and became acquainted with the wider Pentecostal Movement.

In 1922 he began writing articles for Pentecostal periodicals and in 1924, as an accomplished musician himself, he produced the first British Pentecostal hymnbook, Redemption Tidings. He considered joining the Elim denomination but in 1924 Gee was one of the pioneers of the Assemblies of God in Great Britain and Ireland. From 1925 to 1963 he sat on the executive presbytery as an esteemed and valued contributor.

In 1928 he responded to an invitation to go to Australia and New Zealand as a Bible teacher, a ministry in which he excelled. En route he wrote his famous first book, Concerning Spiritual Gifts. Thereafter he lectured across the five continents of the world as an itinerant teaching minister, always gathering new information for his magnum opus, a history of the worldwide Pentecostal Movement, published in 1949, later called Wind and Flame.

During the war he was restricted to travelling in Britain encouraging small Pentecostal fellowships, but thereafter resumed his international travels and at the Pentecostal World Convention in Zurich, in 1947, was chosen to become the editor of the magazine Pentecost producing 76 issues until it concluded in 1966. Here he published some of his finest and most provocative essays for the still adolescent Pentecostal family.

He was highly ecumenical and received harsh criticism for cooperating with the Billy Graham Evangelistic Campaign at Haringey, London in 1954 and for fraternising with denominational leaders who subscribed to the World Council of Churches. In 1961 he was invited as an observer at the New Delhi Assembly of the World Council of Churches, but pressure from Pentecostal leaders in the USA forced him to decline.

In 1951, when he was 60 he accepted an invitation to become the principal of the newly reorganized AoG Bible College at Kenley where he spent the next 13 years. He died two years later of heart failure, aged 75.

He wrote almost 30 books and innumerable magazine articles published in Pentecostal periodicals around the world, 500 in the AoG’s Redemption Tidings alone. His Biblical teaching, his bridge-building and conciliatory manner and his magnanimous attitude to the burgeoning Charismatic movement during his evening years made him a true Christian statesman.

Bibliography: Colin Whittaker, Seven Pentecostal Pioneers, 1983; Donald Gee, Wind and Flame, 1949; D.D. Bundy art. International Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements, 2002.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stanley Frodsham (1882 – 1969) – Tony Cauchi

Originally from here.

Stanley Frodsham 2Writer, editor and teacher who ministered in the Pentecostal movement for over 60 years. For 30 years he was editor of the Pentecostal Evangel. He is mostly remembered for the 15 books he wrote, the best known being a history of the Pentecostal movement, With Signs Following, (1926, enlarged in 1928, revised 1946) a collection of Smith Wigglesworth’s sermons Ever Increasing Faith (1924) and his biography of Smith Wigglesworth, Apostle of Faith (1948).

He was born in Bournemouth, England in 1882 into a godly home where he was encouraged to read the Bible and pray. He attended a private school to learn proper grammar, history and literature in preparation to achieve a career in writing.

On reading the life of Hudson Taylor, founder of the China Inland Mission, he was challenged by this man’s walk with God by his life of faith. A fresh passion was born in his heart to know God like God like Hudson Taylor had. Soon afterwards he was powerfully converted and radically transformed at the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) in London.

He spent a year in Johannesburg, South Africa as secretary of the newly formed YMCA there and in 1906/7 he visited Canada where his appetite was whetted as he began to hear about the Pentecostal revival. Returning to England in 1908 his thirst was quenched when he received the baptism in the Holy Spirit at All Saint’s Church, Sunderland – just one year after Smith Wigglesworth had received the Spirit in the same place – in Pastor and Mrs. Boddy’s home.

In 1909 he began his publishing ministry when he introduced a Pentecostal paper called Victory, a monthly paper that reported on the Pentecostal revival that was sweeping the world. He joined the first Pentecostal church in Bournemouth called the Apostolic Faith. During a visit to Canada in 1910 he met and married an English girl, Alice Rowlands. Smith Wigglesworth performed the marriage ceremony in Britain and then the newly-married couple emigrated to USA.

In 1916 he began his ministry with the AG, soon becoming General Secretary and, in 1921 was elected as editor of all AG publications which included the Pentecostal Evangel.

Back in 1909 he had joined the first Pentecostal church in Bournemouth which had a primary emphasis on prophecy and the restoration of the ministries of Apostles and Prophets. In the late 1940s such emphases were again brought to his attention when he became heavily involved in the Latter Rain Movement.

The main teachings of this movement were:

1. The Latter Rain, meaning an end-time church filled with the power of the Holy Spirit, overcoming and victorious, attaining to the “full stature” of Christ, as taught by Apostle Paul.

2. The Sacrifice of Praise, which was a major emphasis on worship. Teaching on the Tabernacle of David and its restoration was a major theme. Dancing, lifting of hands and spontaneous praise were marks of this movement.

3. Christian Unity. A major theme of the Latter Rain was unity among believers, in the church service, in the geographic region, and at large. They taught that God saw the church organized not into denominational camps, but along geographical lines as in the book of Acts. They expected that in the coming last days, the various Christian denominations would dissolve, and the true church would coalesce into city wide churches under the leadership of the newly-restored apostles and prophets.

4. Laying on of Hands. Unlike Pentecostals who traditionally held that the baptism of the Holy Spirit usually comes after prolonged “tarrying” or waiting for the Spirit, the Latter Rain movement taught that the baptism of the Holy Spirit and the gifts of the Holy Spirit can be imparted on one believer by another through the laying on of hands.

5. The Fivefold Ministry. The Latter Rain taught that there would be a restoration of the five ministerial roles mentioned in Ephesians 4:11 (apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, teacher).

6. Manifest(ed) Sons of God. Some leaders of the Latter Rain movement taught that as the end of the age approached, that the “overcomers” would arise within the Church. These Manifest Sons of God, ones who have come into the full stature of Jesus Christ would receive the Spirit without measure. They would be as Jesus was when He was on earth, they would receive a number of divine gifts, including the ability to change their physical location, to speak any language through the Holy Spirit, and would be able to perform divine healings and other miracles. They would complete the work of God restoring man’s rightful position as was originally mandated in Genesis, and at last by coming into the full stature of Christ usher in the millennial reign of Christ. Though this was not a widespread view. [edit., Some charismatics, like Benny Hinn, have taken this teaching to mean that some prophets are “little gods,” which is a New Age heresy. I totally disagree with any such ideas.–edit]

Some considered the Pentecostal denominations a mere monument to Pentecost’s former glory, so this new movement appeared a breath of fresh air. Singing in the Spirit, the manifestation of spiritual gifts like tongues interpretation and prophecy, people receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit with the sign of tongues by the laying on of hands, miraculous healing etc., brought the life of God into their meetings. Such things had only been read about in Pentecostal history books and records of the early days. Now they had returned and Frodsham, regardless of being in his 60’s, embraced this new move with all his heart and soul.

As the new movement gained more ground there developed considerable controversy with the Assemblies of God and they began a ‘vigorous defence’ against ‘The New Order of the Latter Rain,’ as they called it. In November and December 1949 they published a series aimed at exposing its erroneous beliefs and practices, without direct reference to them by name.

Frodsham’s involvement with the Latter Rain folk caused him to be ‘pretty badly smeared before all the presbyters’ and precipitated his retirement at 67 years of age. A resolution was adopted reinforcing their official disapproval which was then published as a statement in The Pentecostal Evangel. Frodsham continued to accept invitations to Latter Rain assemblies to preach and with great sorrow tendered his resignation from the General Council ministerial list. His reputation suffered loss but he maintained a clear conscience and remained gracious and kind in his attitude to the Assemblies of God. His abiding position was ‘Our differences are temporal, our unity is eternal.’

He continued to minister in Latter Rain circles, teaching for a time at Elim Bible Institute, until his death in 1969.

Bibliography: W. E. Warner art. ‘International Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements‘ 2002, Richard M. Riss ‘Latter Rain’ 1987.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Assemblies of God Books Before 1955

I am reading Gary Wilkerson’s David Wilkerson, chapter 3, which implies that in the 1950s, the Assemblies of God started to lose its spiritual fervor, because it joined the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE). A Michal spirit of “respectability” (2 Samuel 6:16) and anti-“wild Pentecostal zeal” entered into the denomination. It was in 1957 that this dry spiritual climate ousted Wilkerson into independent ministry, led by the Holy Spirit and a good conscience. But Wilkerson was conditioned by AG theology up until that point. Here are some books by Gospel Publishing House (GPH) from that era. It seems that if there ever were spiritual “glory days” of the AG, it was during the 1920s and 30s. In the 40s they started taking a census and boasting of their numbers.

—–

1928 – Donald Gee’s Concerning Spiritual Gifts

1932 – Donald Gee’s Pentecost

1934 – P. C. Nelson’s Bible Doctrines

1937 – Myer Pearlman’s Knowing the Doctrines of the Bible

1946 – Stanley Frodsham’s With Signs Following

1953 – Ernest S. WilliamsSystematic Theology (3 vols)

  • 1906 – Visited Azusa Street Revival
  • 1929-1949 – The AG General Superintendent
  • At the end of the interview in above link, Williams says he would have revised his Systematic Theology when he speaks against Calvinism. He says, “When you read Paul’s epistles, you see a lot of Calvinism.” So, apparently, by the year 1979, he became a OSAS Calvinist Pentecostal. He also said he thought Wigglesworth was eccentric and he didn’t want anything to do with his ministry; he said Seymour wasn’t much of a preacher, either. He said they didn’t let black pastors in the AG, for fear that the southern AG churches would split away. Ehh…I don’t know about this Williams guy…I take him for a dry piece of wood.
  • I’d stick with Gee, Nelson, and Frodsham for orthodox, godly AG theology.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment