Using the Law of God Properly

The law is good if one uses it properly. –1 Timothy 1:8

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Christian’s Love for His Neighbor

Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  –1 Corinthians 13:6

In this article, I am going to draw from four different sources. Because there is no subject in the Christian life more important than love, I feel a strong sense of responsibility to get the doctrine right; and to not water it down, or modernize it, by popular definitions. The four sources I will turn to, are what are called in Wesleyan theology, the “Wesleyan Quadrilateral” of Scripture, Tradition, Reason, and Experience. Although Scripture trumps all the rest, my hermeneutic, or method of Biblical interpretation, will be guided and informed by the other three.

In the Tradition category, I will draw mainly from John Wesley, some of his creation-centered expressions of love from William Law’s A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life, chs. 20-21, Reformed theologian J. I. Packer, Martin Luther’s “A Sermon on Christian Love,” Hugh Binning’s A Treatise of Christian Love (who was a Reformed Arminian Puritan), and John Brown of Edinburgh’s Keeping Christ’s Commandments: A True Manifestation of Love to Him (a nineteenth century Reformed Arminian Presbyterian preacher):–these last two men are interesting, because they both held the view of unlimited atonement, over and against the Calvinist tradition, believing that it is possible to love all men, because God loves all men, and sent His Son into the world to die for all men, not only the “elect.”

In the Reason category, I will appeal to the sound Biblical arguments, or the reasons that these theologians and preachers had given, for why Christians should love their neighbors, and with a particular view in mind.

In the Experience category, I will appeal to my own personal experience with divine love operating in my heart since my conversion, and my gradual or not-so-gradual, growth into a more loving Christian.

Scripture, Tradition, Reason, and Experience may guide the article, but the structure of the article is going to be based on what I feel is the most logical progression of subjects related to love for man operating in the Christian life. This article will not touch so much on God’s love for man, Christ’s love for man, or the world’s love for man or things; nor will we be taking up the subject so much of a Christian’s love for God (although we will have to necessarily touch on that briefly); rather, we will be taking up the subject of a Christian’s love for all mankind or for his neighbor.

Christian Love Fulfills the Moral Law

Jesus, Paul, and John are the three greatest teachers of Christian love (agape) in the New Testament; and it is worthy of noting in the beginning, that all three of them agreed on the view that Christian love fulfills all the moral requirements of God’s law in the Scriptures.

Jesus said, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments” (Matt. 22:37-40). From the outset, we should not interpret Jesus as meaning that a simplistic “loving the Lord” and “loving your neighbor” replaces all the Law and the Prophets, as if we can basically ignore the Ten Commandments (Exod. 20:1-17), the sayings of the prophets, and all the moral directions in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. No, Jesus is saying that these two Mosaic commandments, to love the Lord, which the Jews called the shema (it was a very important devotional Scripture to them, Deut. 6:5); and to love your neighbor (Lev. 19:18), were the most important commandments in all the laws that were given by God to Moses, because it is in these two commandments that all the Ten Commandments, and all the other moral commandments in the Bible are obeyed exactly in the way they were intended. Jesus was not an antinomian (a teacher against the Law of Moses), although the Pharisees accused him of this, Jesus was careful to clarify Himself, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law and the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them,” etc (Matt. 5:17). Jesus had to say this, because all His teaching on grace, mercy, love, and forgiveness were even during His days on earth, coming to be misinterpreted by His disciples and the Pharisees, as a “cheap grace” or morally lax antinomian teaching. While it is clear that Jesus taught flexibility about the ceremonial law, such as how to observe the Sabbath (Matt. 12:1-14), there is not one occasion in the Gospels where He taught laxity with the moral law. And even in Jesus’ teaching on Sabbath observance, He was not breaking any Old Testament regulations, but only the teachings of the rabbis, the “tradition of the elders” (Matt. 15:2), or their interpretations of how to keep the Sabbath, and various rituals. (These teachings were later compiled into the Mishnah.) Jesus closely tied love with keeping God’s law; and that when transgression of the law or sin, increased, when iniquity is said to abound, then “the love of most will grow cold” (Matt. 24:12).

Paul wrote, “Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law. The commandments, ‘Do not commit adultery,’ ‘Do not murder,’ ‘Do not steal,’ ‘Do not covet,’ and whatever other commandment there may be, are summed up in this one rule: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law” (Rom. 13:8-10). Many carnal, morally lax, and antinomian teachers over the centuries have taken the writings of the Apostle Paul, namely Galatians, and have twisted them to their own destruction (2 Pet. 3:16). Taking Paul’s teachings out of their original context, whenever they see in his letters something that says Christians are saved by grace and not by works (Eph. 2:8-9) or when Paul says, “We’re not under law, but under grace” (Rom. 6:14). These people don’t realize that Christian freedom does not mean license to sin (Rom. 6:1-2); it means liberation from the ceremonial law of Judaism as the way of salvation. The Christian way of salvation is much easier: the cross of Christ (Isa. 53), brings immediate forgiveness of sins, by living a life of repentant faith (Rom. 3-8). Paul agrees with Christ: “Love is the fulfillment of the law” (Rom. 13:10; cp. Matt. 22:37-40). But love is not the abolition of the law, as carnal and unstable people teach. Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law” (Matt. 5:17). Abolish means to demolish or overthrow; fulfill means to fill up, perfect, or complete. Jesus was not anti-commandments; He was pro-commandments (and even more so; His teaching was so exacting and heart-searching, that anyone who follows them will obey God’s commandments just as they were originally intended.) And Paul, the once zealous Pharisee, when he came to understand the spiritual nature of Jesus’ teaching, was able to write, “Through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death…in order that the righteous requirements of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the sinful nature but according to the Spirit” (Rom. 8:2, 4). Through faith in the cross, we receive the Holy Spirit, which gives us supernatural love, and supernatural obedience to God. Romans 5:5: “God has poured out His love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom He has given us.” Galatians 5:22: “The fruit of the Spirit is love.”

John also carries on the theme of how love fulfills the moral law in the Christian life; and he goes so far to say, that if someone does not have this Spirit of commandment-keeping love in their life, then they are not saved. But first, John quotes Jesus as saying, “He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me…If anyone loves Me, he will keep My Word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him. He who does not love Me does not keep My Words” (John 14:21, 23-24, NKJV). This from the “disciple whom Jesus loved,” the “apostle of love,” as a close brother and friend of Christ, also later wrote, fending off a group of Gnostic antinomians, “We know that we have come to know Him (Jesus) if we obey His commands. The man who says, ‘I know Him,’ but does not do what He commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But if anyone obeys His Word, God’s love is truly made complete in him” (1 John 2:3-5). “Knowing God” is another Biblical expression for being saved; those who do not “know God” are spoken of as going to Hell: Christ “will punish those who do not know God and do not obey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of His power” (2 Thess. 1:8-9). “This is love for God: to obey His commands. And His commands are not burdensome” (1 John 5:3). And John agrees with Paul, that the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit in a Christian, produces divine love for other people: “If we love one another, God lives in us and His love is made complete in us…God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him” (1 John 4:12, 16).

Commandment-Keeping and Christian Contemplation:
Ways of Experiencing More of God’s Love

Dwelling in God and in His love is a continual spiritual discipline, no doubt cultivated by keeping God’s commandments; and also by silent prayer. Harald Lindström, the Wesley scholar, states that John Wesley believed contemplative prayer was a means by which to be filled with more of the love of the Holy Spirit: “If the eye of faith is steadily fixed on God’s love in Christ man is filled with ever greater love to God and man. Love to God can also be regarded as a direct result of the contemplation of God;” and quoting Wesley: “Now, if God should ever open the eyes of your understanding, must not the love of God be the immediate consequence? Do you imagine you can see God without loving Him?”[1] I have had personal experience of this! I remember in 2006 I was on a mountain retreat with a Christian friend, and I stole away into the woods for solitude and prayer. I was fixing my eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of my faith (Heb. 12:2), and I experienced a kind of inner vision, and I had a sudden flash of understanding come into my heart and mind:–that God loves all of the creatures that He has made, animate and inanimate—stars, dolphins, trees, animals, plants, men, women, and children…because He made them, He designed them, and He loves them. And this Spirit and revelation was in my understanding for some time; because the vision was amazing. I came out of prayer, and went to the Bible study session, only to discover that the theme the retreat leaders had chosen was love! And do I try to keep God’s commandments? Ever since I got saved in 2000—Jesus has been my Lord first, and Savior second. Almost legalistically, I try to keep the law of Christ, reforming my old ways, and striving for purity of thought every single moment. There is no other way to see the Lord (Heb. 12:14). Repentance from sin is a continual walk of faith, hope, and love; and I have no other view of how to be a Christian, but by exacting obedience to God in every Biblical way; yet sometimes, my focus gets off balance, I’ll get distracted, and I will focus on this or that thing in the Word, and forget that the main point of everything is to love God and neighbor (Matt. 22:37-40).

Christian Love Offers Charity to All

It’s one thing to say you feel pure and holy, divine love for all people; it’s quite another to act on it and offer proof that it is there. “Charity” in the KJV is a fitting translation of the Greek word agape in 1 Corinthians 13:1-13. If you were to look at all the uses of the word agape in the New Testament with Strong’s concordance, you would find it being used in the sense of an act of charity. Of course, it is a fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5:22); charity is a Spirit of Generosity; but it finds its expression in works of charity, charitable activities, or “mercy ministries,” such as feeding the hungry, showing hospitality to strangers, clothing the poor, visiting the sick, or those in prison (Matt. 25:35-36). Jesus illustrated agape in His parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37). This agape, this charitable love, this love of neighbor is profiled in positive and negative descriptions by Paul: “Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres” (1 Cor. 13:4-7). Lindström summarizes Wesley’s understanding of the Spirit of Love: “It is a ‘universal, disinterested love,’ ‘a sincere, tender, disinterested love for all mankind,’ ‘universal benevolence; tender good-will to all men.’ It is described as a ‘tender good-will to all the souls that God has made’ or as ‘benevolence to our fellow creatures’…a ‘real, disinterested benevolence to all mankind,’…he says that neighborly love is a ‘pure, disinterested good-will to every child of man.’”[2]

But universal Christian charity is not the only meaning of agape in the New Testament. Although the word agape literally means “affection or benevolence; charity; charitable” (charitable love):–the word is also used in reference to church members loving one another as brothers and sisters. Those in pastoral ministry must see such a need for this! Backbiting, talebearing, and all kinds of divisive and malicious behavior occur among church members. But Christ and the apostles will not allow it! Jesus; and especially the apostles repeatedly tell the churches to “agape one another” (John 13:34-35; 15:12, 17; Gal. 5:13; Eph. 4:2; Col. 1:4; 1 Thess. 3:12; 1 John 4:11-12):–which implies it must require the Holy Spirit to show charitable love to such hard to love, oftentimes mean, unloving, unlovable people, who are, as Hugh Binning said, “worthy of hatred.”[3] In a way, it’s a renewal of Jesus’ teaching to love your enemies (Matt. 5:44), but taking it further, to love them as brothers and sisters, self-sacrificially, and as Wesley said, “disinterested”: expecting no love in return. Showing them the same kind of love Christ did, when He willingly offered up His life on the cross, for the sins of the whole world: friends, enemies, and everyone.

Sweet fellowship of brotherly and sisterly love (more comparable to phileo) can be experienced between saints, but this is rare. This, it seems, when given its sanctifying parameters, is a mixture of agape and phileo (a holy brotherly or sisterly love between Christian friends—a love with godly interest and godly reciprocation; a love that gives as well as receives; and is more of a blessing than a cross). This is a heightened, and dare I say, rare form of godly love, rarely spoken of in the New Testament. But if the Christian will pursue self-sacrificing charity (agape) to those that do not love him, the Holy Spirit will come alongside, and help; enabling him to see and know that love which Christ had in Him when He offered Himself up on the cross. “God demonstrates His own love for us in this: While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom. 5:8). What an act of charity! To die on a cross in order to satisfy God’s wrath at us, so that all who repentantly believe, will be saved from eternal damnation! This is the sort of love (agape) that Christians are to demonstrate to all men, if they intend on imitating Christ; and being Christian disciples. Sure, it doesn’t literally mean dying for someone (although in some cases it might come to that):–but overall there is the concept of sacrificing yourself to show Christ’s charity to other people; as did the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37).

The Golden Rule, however, puts a simple parameter on the exercise of charity, lest those charitable Christians be taken advantage of, and allow themselves to be made into doormats, for abusive people to walk all over: “In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this is the sum of the Law and the Prophets”; and “love your neighbor as yourself” (Matt. 7:12; 22:39). Lindström said of Wesley, “In the exposition of the commandment to love one’s neighbour as oneself, self-love is regarded as an obvious pre-requisite”; and quoting Wesley, “We would that all men should love and esteem us, and behave towards us according to justice, mercy, and truth…let us walk by the same rule: let us do unto all as we would they should do to us. Let us love and honour all men.”[4] This allows for some measure of self-protection from unjust, unmerciful, liars who would seek to take opportunity of a charitable Christian, and really cause him harm. If we are to love others as we love ourselves; then that means we should obviously, really in fact love ourselves (only not in an overly selfish, egotistic, or self-centered way).

Christian Love Is Not Carnal Tolerance

In my personal experience of being a member or participant in various Christian ministry groups, I have repeatedly come across the concept that Christian love is nothing more than a we-can-all-get-along kind of tolerance. Forgetting all the Biblical descriptions of love, such as fulfilling the moral law, or giving prominence to charitable activities, or loving all of God’s creatures, the word “love,” it seems to me has been very misused by modern-day Christians, and still is. I suspect that this counterfeit teaching on love is influenced both by pop psychology and hippie ethos, filtering down to us through the Baby Boomers and the Jesus Movement of the 60s and 70s. Thomas Harris’ I’m OK—You’re OK (1967) idea seems to have prevailed upon the liberal mainline as well as the evangelical churches. “Judge not lest ye be judged” (Matt. 7:1), comes along with the understanding, that it is itself a sin to speak out or preach against sin, to expose the fruitless deeds of darkness (Eph. 5:11). We are told by prominent Christian leaders that Jesus means for us to tolerate sin, not expose it; that being non-judgmental is the highest, most “loving” road to take; that love is basically defined, or understood to mean, over-simplistically, nothing more than accepting everyone just the way they are; showing off a kind, friendly demeanor (usually fake, with an empty naturally-based sentiment in the heart), regardless of harmful vices and sins that could be obviously crowding their lives, and bringing destruction and despair to them, their friends, family, and relatives. We are told to leave them in the darkness, in so many words; and “just as I am” to receive God’s forgiveness, I am also to remain just as I am, knowing I’ll always be forgiven automatically of whatever I do. Christ Jesus is no longer in the ethical transformation business. Jesus is a hippie, or “Jesus is My Homeboy” as one recent sexually charged girls t-shirt came out years ago. There is no fear of God before their eyes. This is a carnal, antinomian form of Jesus, in fact “another Jesus” (2 Cor. 11:4), of which many have no comparison to the real Jesus described in the Bible, because Biblical illiteracy is at an all-time high. People simply seem to assume that Jesus was a loving, non-judgmental, tolerant hippie, who offers easy forgiveness to everyone, and does not expect the smallest measure of repentance from personal sin.

I have had a concern about this ever since I got saved and tried to live by the Bible in 2000. And for the longest time, I’ve had nothing but the Bible and my personal experience to bolster my conviction against this false, sin-accommodating idea of love. As I learned theology, I eventually found some corroborating evidence among godly theologians, that this is a type of heresy called antinomianism (anti-law-ism), and although “love” is in this case the concept used to excuse obedience to God’s commandments, there are other forms of it as well. What peace it brought to my heart to know for sure that Christ is not a minster of sin; but that He has come to deliver us from its power over our lives! (Romans 8). Wesley agreed: love is not “a love of esteem or of complacence” (man-pleasing); “it does not mean latitudinarianism” (religious tolerance);[5] love is not “an empty and vain sentimentality” (sentimental, natural favoritism without any spiritual depth).[6] Love is not political correctness, or man-pleasing, just to get people to “like” you in a social manner; as churches are often seen as any other social club in the community. Paul wrote, “Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ” (Gal. 1:10). Man-pleasing is not the love of God; it is a self-centered, cowardly “seeker-friendly” approach to “not offending” people, so that you don’t “hurt their feelings”—and here’s the catch—even if your godly, mild, temperate rebuke could save their souls. It’s a humanist understanding of love, not Biblical, and not Christian. And often, this sort of “tolerant love” leads to the idolatry of interfaith activities with people of non-Christian religions. That is not the power of God unto salvation! They say, “Love the sinner; hate the sin,” but in practice they love the sin too, because they never take a stand against it, even in a proper, meek spirit. As for the Pharisees: “they loved praise from men more than praise from God” (John 12:43). J. I. Packer defines this kind of fake love-centered antinomianism:

Situationist antinomianism says that a motive and intention of love is all that God now requires of Christians, and the commands of the Ten Commandments and other ethical parts of Scripture, for all that they are ascribed to God directly, are mere rules of thumb for loving, rules that love may at any time disregard. But Romans 13:8-10, to which this view appeals, teaches that without love as a motive these specific commands cannot be fulfilled. Once more an unacceptably weak view of Scripture surfaces.[7]

Dr. Joel Beeke, a well-known Reformed theologian and Puritan scholar, active in today’s New Calvinist movement, says:

“Popular media often present love as feelings of attraction and pleasure, but such feelings rise and fall like mercury in a thermometer. We need love that is less like a thermometer and more like a thermostat—controlling our reactions rather than being controlled by them.

“Others speak of love as non-judgmental, unconditional acceptance, derived from the psychological concept of unconditional positive regard.[8] But this overly-simplistic approach is confusing and leaves us powerless in the face of malice and evil. How do you unconditionally and non-judgmentally accept a terrorist or a serial killer?

Love does not behave indecently (1 Cor. 13:5)…This statement disqualifies any antinomian view of love; love extends to God’s law (Ps. 119:97) and strives to fulfill it (Rom. 13:8-10).

Love does not rejoice in injustice, but it rejoices in the truth (1 Cor. 13:6). Love is jubilant whenever it encounters righteousness and faithfulness. Yet love grieves over news that someone has fallen into sin and paid a heavy price for it; thus, love does not regard such news as a tasty morsel for gossip. Such love does good, even to enemies.

“Verse 6 (1 Cor. 13:6) rebukes the idol of relativistic tolerance that often passes for love in our culture; sincere love includes hatred for evil (Rom. 12:9). The greatest display of God’s love was also the greatest demonstration of His righteousness, as His Son satisfied God’s justice by bearing the penalty for our sins (Rom. 3:25-26). So 1 Corinthians 13:6 corrects the popular Christian notion that love has nothing to do with feelings. Love has strong feelings against sin and for righteousness.”[9]

Christian Love Is Not Universalism

When a tolerant “loving” antinomian Christian thinks about Hell, it does not usually produce good theological results. In this mentality, there is an aversion to the attributes of God’s holiness, justice, and omnipotence. God is no longer seen as a Judge, but only as a tender Father over all mankind: including “good” people in non-Christian religions. This results either in an allegorizing of the New Testament passages of Hell, fire, torment of the wicked, and/or a reevaluation of the doctrine of eternal punishment:–the Biblical teaching that the wicked will suffer in the fire of Hell for all eternity (Matt. 25:46; Rev. 14:11; 20:10, 15). As this doctrine naturally makes a tender-hearted Christian to cringe, we cannot ignore it, because it is Biblical revelation: it is the Word of God. Traditional Reformed Protestant theology has taught that God’s love was manifested in the cross of Christ, so that sins could be freely forgiven, and sinners reconciled to a holy God. The universalists, which are heretical Christians filtered throughout many denominations today, maintain that there is either no Hell, or that Hell is like Purgatory, where in the end God will talk all the damned out of their sinful addictions, and by His infinite compassion, and mercy, let them all into Heaven.[10] This idea was expressed in Rob Bell’s Love Wins (2012). This begs the question, however, “Will Satan and his demons be saved by God’s infinite love too?” But the universalist squirms at such thoughts. And usually retracts by attacking the traditional Biblical view of God as a Judge and as an avenger of the righteous, who are the only true children of the Father.

A Summary of Christian Love (Agape)

I have not surveyed the entire Bible on love. Maybe I will do that one day in the future. But in this article, I have attempted to provide a Biblical, Wesleyan, and somewhat Puritan view of the Christian’s love that he should have towards his neighbor, as it is taught in the New Testament. I have focused on the New Testament Greek word agape as the normative concept for love in the Christian life. We have found that agape is morally righteous, it keeps God’s commandments; and is a supernaturally given fruit of the Holy Spirit, received by repentant faith in Christ’s atoning work on the cross. Further, New Testament love is a charity-love or charitable love that reaches out with arms of divine generosity to all of mankind, to all of the creatures that God has made. Although this love is universal or all-encompassing in its outreach, with regard to death and the afterlife, it does not embrace universalism (or the idea that God’s love will save damned people out of Hell).

Listen to Martin Luther. To be without agape in our lives is a horrible curse:

“We have seen what abominations ensue where love is lacking; such individuals are proud, envious, puffed up, impatient, unstable, false, venomous, suspicious, malicious, disdainful, bitter, disinclined to service, distrustful, selfish, ambitious, and haughty.”[11]

I pray that the love of God would be shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost!

I pray that we would dwell in God; and dwell in love!

I pray that we would always seek to be law-abiding and pure!


[1] Harald Lindström, Wesley and Sanctification (Nappanee, IN: Francis Asbury Press, 1980), p. 188.

[2] Harald Lindström, Wesley and Sanctification, p. 191.

[3] Hugh Binning, A Treatise of Christian Love, ch. 3.

[4] Harald Lindström, Wesley and Sanctification, p. 195-196.

[5] Harald Lindström, Wesley and Sanctification, pp. 191, 194.

[6] Kenneth J. Collins, The Scripture Way of Salvation (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1997), p. 123.

[7] J. I. Packer, Concise Theology (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1993), pp. 179-180.

[8] Unconditional positive regard, or “unconditional love,” was popularized in the psychiatric community by humanist Carl Rogers’ On Becoming a Person (1961). Martin Luther King, Jr. is quoted as having said, “I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right, temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil triumphant.” Dec. 10, 1964, Oslo, Norway. Thomas Harris’ I’m OK—You’re OK (1967) popularized non-judgmentalism among the hippies. “Positive” and “negative” dichotomy. Clearly tolerant non-judgmental love is a 60s pop psychology concept.

[9] Joel Beeke, “Love’s Attributes” from http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/loves-attributes/

[10] J. I. Packer in Hell Under Fire, eds. Christopher Morgan and Robert Peterson (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2004), pp. 189-194.

[11] Martin Luther, “A Sermon on Christian Love” (an exposition of 1 Corinthians 13:1-13).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Liberalism, Postmodernism, and Progressive Christianity

Books against mainline liberalism would be J. Gresham Machen’s Christianity and Liberalism, Roger Olson’s Against Liberal Theology, and The Fundamentals: A Testimony To The Truth (Baker Books, 4 vols).

I personally believe that Ken Ham’s view of “young earth creationism” is what the Bible plainly says about creation and origins. If you’re honestly seeking answers about this, then buy Four Views on Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design edited by Stanley Gundry. There’s also tons of free, intellectually rigorous creationist material available on creation.com.

If you’re a seeker and are struggling with honest skepticism about apparent Bible contradictions, then buy Norman Geisler’s When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties (Baker, 1992), and the bibliography in the back: “Select Books on Bible Difficulties.”

Agnostics seem to think they’re without guilt before God, because they say they just don’t know: and so why would God condemn them if he was fair and just? Lie! God expects people to trust in Him and place their faith in the unseen realities of the Gospel. Plus, how can they be guiltless since they always argue against every supernatural thing that happens to them?

Hebrews 11:1: “Faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Review of Michael J. Oard’s “The Deep Time Deception”

In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them. –Moses in Exodus 20:11

If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say? –Jesus in John 5:46-47

Click here to view a sample of Michael J. Oard’s The Deep Time Deception.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tolerating Rude and Nasty People

I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one. –1 Corinthians 5:11

Jacob heard that Laban’s sons were saying, “Jacob has taken everything our father owned and has gained all this wealth from what belonged to our father.” And Jacob noticed that Laban’s attitude toward him was not what it had been.
Then the Lord said to Jacob, “Go back to the land of your fathers and to your relatives, and I will be with you.” –Genesis 31:1-3

Definitions of Revile:

to speak to or about in an insulting way.  –Merriam-Webster Dictionary

someone who speaks abusively or contemptuously to or of another person or thing.  –Random House Unabridged Dictionary

to use abusive or contemptuous language in speaking to or about; call bad names…If someone or something is reviled, people hate them intensely or show their hatred of them.  –Collins Advanced Learner’s Dictionary

to criticize someone strongly, or say unpleasant things to or about someone.  –Cambridge Dictionary

A reviler is a person who uses words to damage, control, or insult someone’s character or reputation. Today we would call a reviler a verbal abuser.  –GotQuestions.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Biblical Economics 67: Trading Strategies for Low-Priced Stocks 2

DISCLAIMER

I am not a registered investment advisor with the SEC. Nothing in this video, should be taken as legally binding investment advice, in the same way that SEC licensed stockbrokers can advise their clients. I am not “selling” any stocks or OTC penny stocks as a broker in this video. The purpose of this video, is only to offer guidance to those who are interested in educating themselves, about self-directed investing and Biblically Responsible Investing (BRI).

Books About Low-Priced Stocks

1. F. Philip Rice’s Getting Rich with Low-Priced Stocks. Prentice-Hall, 1984. My favorite.

2. Ira Cobleigh’s The $2 Window on Wall Street. Macmillan, 1986. My 2nd favorite.

3. Robert Frick’s Keys to Risks and Rewards of Penny Stocks. Barron’s, 1990. My 3rd fav.

4. Bruce McWilliams’ Penny Stocks. Warner Books, 1982.

5. George Angell’s Small Stocks for Big Profits. Wiley, 2008.


6. R. Max Bowser’s Making Dollars with Pennies. 2nd Edition. Marathon, 2004.

7. Peter Leeds’ Penny Stocks for Dummies. 3rd Edition. Wiley, 2022.

Newsletters About Low-Priced Stocks

1. The Bowser Report

2. Peter Leeds Stock Picks

3. The KonLin Letter

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Biblical Economics 66: Massive Bulk Outreach Is Needed During Recessions

Share what you have with seven or eight others, because you never know when disaster may strike. –Ecclesiastes 11:2 (CEV)

Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their labor: if either of them falls down, one can help the other up. But pity anyone who falls and has no one to help them up…Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken. –Ecclesiastes 4:9, 10, 12 (NIV)

UPDATE: 4/14/23 – After my call with AnyBiz I concluded they are scammers. I still feel like the best scenario is rigging up a Contabo SMTP with a G-Suite and GMass through one of the guys on Fiverr that can rig up the DNS records, etc. Once it gets blacklisted then simply do another one. I’ve had 2 or 3 guys from Fiverr rig up a Contabo SMTP on GMass for me. Usually they are from Bangladesh: a small country northeast of India. The namesake of the Bengal tiger and its place in The Jungle Book. Roawr!

UPDATE: 5/2/23 – Contabo / Cogent has a policy against cold email use of their SMTP. #14 of the Cogent “Acceptable Use Policy” – perhaps GMass SMTP (SendGrid) is better.

UPDATE: 5/4/23

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Biblical Economics 65: Trading Strategies for Low-Priced Stocks

DISCLAIMER

I am not a registered investment advisor with the SEC. Nothing in this video, should be taken as legally binding investment advice, in the same way that SEC licensed stockbrokers can advise their clients. I am not “selling” any stocks or OTC penny stocks as a broker in this video. The purpose of this video, is only to offer guidance to those who are interested in educating themselves, about self-directed investing and Biblically Responsible Investing (BRI).



Buying 1,000 shares of one low-priced gainer stock on Finviz is the general practice of short-term traders. Stock profits are usually achieved faster this way.


–F. Philip Rice, Getting Rich with Low-Priced Stocks (Prentice-Hall, 1984), pgs. 5-6; Luke 19:16


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Directions About Sports and Recreations – Richard Baxter

Originally from here.

This section represents the general Puritan view on the subject of sports, games, athletics, entertainment, and plays. It is taken from Richard Baxter’s A Christian Directory, which was published in 1673. You may not agree with everything he says here; and I don’t necessarily either. Although I will say that I agree with most of what he is saying. Some of his archaic English words have been modernized or paraphrased in this article to make it easier to read. I have personally developed somewhat of an anti-sports view over the course of my life (but not to the point of the Amish), because I have noticed that sports are often plagued by egotistical and competitive attitudes, which unsanctify the hearts of the athletes. While athletics are generally beneficial to physical health, I would agree with Baxter that the competitive and egotistical nature of many of them, runs against most of the principles of Christian holiness. On the one hand, “Bodily exercise profits a little bit” (1 Tim. 4:8); but on the other hand, “In everything, then, do to others as you would have them do to you. For this is the essence of the law and the prophets” (Matt. 7:12). Most of the kinds of sports available to us today, do not encourage the Golden Rule. They get people into thinking about defeating an enemy, or even hating an enemy. Baxter can help us to see why and how certain types of sports might be avoided, while others still might be physically useful, while at the same time not harmful to the soul. Some of the biggest takeaways that I’ve noticed are:

1. If non-Christians are playing any sport, then they will definitely make an ungodly use of it; and anyone engaged in the game will have to be involved in that.

2. Intense physical exercise on Sunday seems to break the Sabbath requirement to rest and worship.

3. It is obvious that athletes often tend to “defame and reproach other men” while they are stirred up into a spirit of competition. This in turn leads to “swearing, and cursing, and railing, and fighting.”

4. Many sports have a violent element to them, such as football, boxing, hockey, etc, and can only be viewed as “cruel recreations” that should be labeled “unlawful” in God’s sight, because they only encourage people to take “pleasure in the beholding of duelers, fighters, or any that abuse each other.”

5. Such sports as those mentioned above are but temptations and time wasters for Christians, who can be engaged in much healthier athletic activities and exercises, which will strengthen the body and mind, and not endanger the soul: such as walking, running, weight lifting, etc. 

6. We should be careful not to become “lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God” (1 Timothy 3:4). Too many athletes and sports enthusiasts get themselves so passionate about their games, that they neglect and hate the Bible, theology, prayer, or any talk about the Spirit of God, soteriology, and any spiritual things at all. And so Baxter concludes, and I think rightly, that “an idle time wasting sensual sporter, every one should look on with pity as a miserable wretch.”                –J.B.



§. 1. Direct. 1. If you would escape the sin and danger, which men commonly run into by unlawful sporting, under pretense of lawful recreations; you must understand what lawful recreation is, and what is its proper end and use. No wonder else if you sin, when you know not what you do?

§. 2. No doubt but some sport and recreation is lawful, even needful, and therefore a duty to some men. Lawful sport or recreation is the use of some natural thing or action, not forbidden us, for the exhilarating of the natural spirits by the mind, and due exercise of the natural parts, thereby to fit the body and mind for ordinary duty to God. It is some delightful exercise.

§. 3. 1. We do not call unpleasing labor by the name of sport or recreation; though it may be better and more necessary. 2. We call not every delight by the name of sport or recreation: for eating and drinking, may be delightful, and holy things and duties may be delightful; and yet not properly sports or recreations. But it is the mind that is chiefly delighted by sports.

§. 4. Qual. 1. All these things following are necessary to the lawfulness of a sport or recreation, and the want of any one of them will make and prove it to be unlawful. 1. The end which you really intend in using it, must be to fit you for your service to God; that is, either for your callings, or for his worship, or some work of obedience in which you may please and glorify him. 1 Corinthians 10:31: “Whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” It is just to your duty, as the mowers’ sharpening of his scythe, to make it for to do his work.

§. 5. Qual. 2. Therefore the person that uses it, must be one that is heartily devoted to God, and his service, and really lives to do his work, and please and glorify him in the world: which none but the godly truly do! And therefore no carnal ungodly person, that has no such holy end, can use any recreation lawfully: because he uses it not to a due end: for the end is essential to the moral good of any action: and an evil end must necessarily make it evil. Titus 1:15: “Unto the pure all things are pure (that is, all things not forbidden); but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure, but even their mind and conscience is defiled.”

§. 6. Quest. But must all wicked men therefore forbear recreation?

Answ. 1. Wicked men are such as will not obey God’s law if they know it; and therefore they enquire not what they should do, with any purpose sincerely to obey. But if they would obey; that which God commands them is immediately to forsake their wickedness, and to become the servants of God, and then there will be no room for the question. 2. But if they will continue in a sinful ungodly state, it is in vain to contrive how they may sport themselves without sin. But yet we may tell them that if the sport be materially lawful, it is not the matter, that they are bound to forsake, but it is the sinful end and manner? And till this be reformed they cannot but sin.

§. 7. Qual. 3. A lawful recreation must be a means fitly chosen and used to this end: if it have no aptitude to fit us for God’s service in our ordinary callings and duty, it can be to us no lawful recreation. Though it be lawful to another that it is a real help to, it is unlawful to us.

§. 8. Qual. 4. 4. Therefore all recreations are unlawful, which are themselves preferred before our callings, or which are used by a man that lives idly, or in no calling, and hath no ordinary work to make him need them. For these are no fit means, which exclude our end, instead of furthering it.

§. 9. Qual. 5. 5. Therefore all those are unlawful sports, which are used only to delight a carnal mind, and have no higher end, than to please the sickly mind that loveth them.

§. 10. Qual. 6. 6. And therefore all those are unlawful sports, which really unfit us for the duties of our callings and the service of God: which, laying the benefit and hurt together, do hinder us as much or more than they help us! Which is the case of all voluptuous and lustful people.

§. 11. Qual. 7. 7. All sports are unlawful which take up any part of the time, which we should spend in greater works: such are all those that are unseasonable: (as on the Lord’s Day without necessity, or when we should be at prayer, or any other duty): and all those that take up more time than the end of a recreation doth necessarily require (which is too common).

§. 12. Qual. 8. 8. If a recreation be profane, as making fun of holy things, it is a mocking of God, and villainy unbeseeming any of his creatures, and laying them open to his heaviest vengeance. The children that made sport with calling the prophet bald head were slain by bears.

§. 13. Qual. 9. 9. They are unlawful sports which are used to the wrong of others: as players that defame and reproach other men: and hunters and hawkers that tread down poor men’s corn and hedges.

§. 14. Qual. 10. 10. It is sinful to make fun of other men’s sinning, or to act it ourselves so as to become partakers of it: which is too common with comedians, and other profane wits.

§. 15. Qual. 11. 11. Unclean obscene recreations are unlawful! When filthiness or wantonness is represented without a due expression of its odiousness; or with obscene words or actions. Ephesians 5:3: “But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not once be once named among you as becometh saints, neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting.”

§. 16. Qual. 12. 12. Those sports are unlawful, which occasion the multiplying of idle words about them; and engage the players in foolish, needless, unprofitable speeches.

§. 17. Qual. 13. 13. And those sports are sinful, which plainly tend to provoke our selves or others to sin: as to lust, to swearing, and cursing, and railing, and fighting or the like.

§. 18. Qual. 14. 14. Those also are sinful, which are the exercise of covetousness, to win other men’s money of them: or that tend to stir up covetousness in those you play with.

§. 19. Qual. 15. 15. Cruel recreations also are unlawful: as taking pleasure in the beholding of duelers, fighters, or any that abuse each other, or any other creatures that needlessly torment each other.

§. 20. Qual. 16. 16. Too costly recreation also is unlawful: when you are but God’s stewards and must be accountable to him for all you have, it’s sinful to expend it needlessly on sports.

§. 21. Qual. 17. 17. Unnecessary recreations forbidden by our lawful governors are unlawful: if they were before lawful to you, yet now they are not; because your king, your pastor, your parents, your masters have power to rule and restrain you in such things; and you must obey them.

§. 22. Qual. 18. 18. Lastly, if you have the choice of diverse recreations before you, you must choose the most fitting: and if you choose one that is less fit and profitable, when a fitter might be chosen, it is your sin: though that which you choose were lawful, if you had no other.

§. 23. By all this it is easy to judge of our common stage plays, gaming, cards, dice, and diverse other such kind of sports. If they have but any one of these evil qualifications they are sinful: and when are they used without very many of them? 1. They are too commonly used by men that never intended to fit themselves for their work and duty by them: yes by men that live not at all to the pleasing and glorifying of God, and know not what it is to be obediently addicted to his service? Yes by men that live not in any constant honest labor, but make a very trade of their recreations, and use them as the chief business of the day.

§. 24. 2. They are sports unfit for the ends of a lawful recreation, as will easily appear to the impartial. For it is either your bodies or your minds that have the greatest need of recreations: Either you are sedentary persons, or have a calling of bodily labor: if you are sedentary persons (as students, scribes, and diverse others) then it is your bodies that have most need of exercise and recreation, and labor is fitter for you than sport; or at least a stirring laboring sport: and in this case to sit at cards, or dice, or a stage play, is, instead of exercising your bodies, to increase the need of exercising them: It stirs not your parts; it warms not your blood; it helps not concoction, attraction, assimilation, &c. It does you much more harm than good, as to your very health. But if you are hard laborers, and need rest for your bodies and recreation for your minds; or are lame or sickly that you cannot use bodily exercise, than surely a hundred profitable exercises are at hand which are more suitable to your case. You have books of necessity to read (as the word of God:) and books of profit to your souls, and books that tend to increase your knowledge in common things; as history, geography, and all arts and sciences! And should not these be any of them more pleasant than your dice, and cards, and plays.

§. 25. 3. At least it is plain that they are not the fittest recreations for any man that intends a lawful end. If you are students, or idle gentlemen, is not walking, or riding, or shooting, or some honest bodily labor rather, that joins pleasure and profit together, a fitter kind of exercise for you? Or if you are laboring persons, and need only pleasure for your minds, should you not take pleasure in God, in Scripture, in holy conference, meditation, or good books? Or if indeed you need a relaxation from both these, have you not profitable history or geography to read? Have you not herbs, and flowers, and trees, and beasts, and birds and other creatures to behold? Have you not fields, or gardens, or meadows, or woods to walk into? Have you not your near relations to delight in; your wives, or children, or friends, or servants? May you not talk with good, and wise, and cheerful men, about things that are both pleasing and edifying to you? Hath God given you such a world of lawful pleasures, and will none of them, nor all of them serve your purposes, without unlawful ones;  or at least unfit ones (which therefore are unlawful): all these are undoubtedly lawful: but cards, and dice, and stage plays are at best, very questionable: among wise and learned men, and good men, and no small number of these, they are condemned as unlawful. And should one that fears God and loves his salvation, choose so doubtful a sport, before such an abundance of undoubtedly lawful ones. If you be so proud or rash as to reply, “Why should I give up my sport for another man’s conceits or judgment?” I will tell you that which shall shame your reply, and you if you can blush. 1. It is not some humorous odd fanatic that I bring against you, nor a single theologian, but it is the judgement of the ancient church itself: the fathers and councils condemn Christians and ministers especially, that use spectacula [spectacles], or behold stage plays and dicing. 2. Even the oldest canons of our own Church of England forbid playing with dice to the clergy, which is because they reputed it evil, or of ill report. 3. Many laws of religious princes do condemn them. 4. Abundance of the most educated holy theologians condemn them. 5. The sober-minded and educated among the Catholics condemn them. 6. And how great a number of the most spiritual ministers and people are against them, of the age and place in which you live, you are not ignorant. And is the judgment of the ancient church, and of councils, and fathers, and of the most educated Protestants and Catholics, and the most religious people, besides many ancient laws and canons, of no force with you in such a case as this? Will you hold to a thing admittedly unnecessary, against the judgment of so many that account them sinful? Are you and your play fellows more wise and learned than all these? Or is it not an extreme form of pride for such unread and shallow men, to prefer their sensual conceits, before such a concurrent stream of wiser and more ponderous judgments? Read but Dr. Io. Reignolds his Treatise Against Stage-Plays, against Albericus Gentilis, and you will see what a world of witnesses are against you. And if the judgment of Voetius, Amesius and other educated men against all lotteries be of no authority, at least it should move you that even Mr. Gataker, and other that write for the lawfulness of them in that respect (as lotteries) do yet lay down the rest of the requisites to make them lawful, which utterly condemn our common use of cards and dice, much more our gamesters: so that all the sober divines that ever I read or heard, condemn all these? And are you wiser than all of them?

§. 26. 4. Besides this, your consciences know that you are so far from them using to fit you for your callings, that you either live idly out of a calling, or else you prefer them before your callings: you have no mind of your work, because your mind is so much upon your play, you have no mind of your home or family, but are weary of your business; because your sports withdraw your hearts: and you are so far from using them to prepare you for any holy duty, that they utterly unfit you, and corrupt your hearts with such a kind of sensual delight, as makes them more backward to all that is good; insomuch that many of you, even grow so desperate as to hate and scorn it. This is the benefit that it brings to you.

§. 27. 5. And you cannot but know what a time wasting sin it is: suppose the game were never so lawful! Is it lawful to lay out so many hours upon it? as if you had neither souls, nor bodies, nor families, nor estates, nor God, nor death, nor Heaven to mind?

§. 28. 6. And how much profaneness, or abuse of others is in many of your stage plays? How much wantonness and amorous folly, and representing sin in a manner to entice men to it, rather than to make it odious, making fun of sin; with a great deal more such evil. And your cards and dice are the exercise usually of covetousness, the occasion of a great deal of idle talk, and foolish babble about every dice that is cast, and every card; and often times the occasion of cursing, and swearing, and railing, and hatred of those that win your money, and oft it hath occasioned fighting, and murder itself. And even your huntings are commonly recreations that are so costly; as that the charge that keeps a pack of hounds, would keep a poor man’s family that is now in want: besides the time that this also consumes. So that the case is clear, that our gamesters and licentious sportful gallants, are a sort of people that have blinded their minds and seared their consciences, and despise the laws and presence of God, and forget death and judgement, and live as if there were no life to come, neglecting their miserable souls, and having no delight in the Word or holy worship of God, nor the forethoughts of eternal joys, and therefore seek for their pleasure in such foolish sports, and spend those precious hours in these vanities, which, God knows, they had need to spend most diligently, in repenting of their sins, and cleansing their souls, and preparing for another world.

§. 29. If yet any impenitent gambler or idle time waster shall reply, “I will not believe that my cards, or dice, or plays are unlawful. I use them only to relax me for my job. What! would you have all men live like hermits or monks without all pleasure?” I answer you but by this reasonable request: will you set yourselves as dying men in the presence of God, and the light of eternity, and provide a true answer to these few questions; even such an answer as your consciences dare stand to at the bar of God?

§. 30. Quest. 1. Don’t you think in your conscience that your maker, and redeemer, and his work and service, and thy family and calling, and the forethoughts of Heaven, are not fitter matters to delight a sober mind, than cards or stage plays? And what can it be but a vain and sinful mind that should make these toys so pleasant to you, and the thoughts of God and Heaven so unpleasant?

§. 31. Quest. 2. Does not your conscience tell you, that it is not to fit you for your calling or God’s service, that you use these sports, but only to delight a carnal fantasy? Does not conscience tell you, that it is more the pleasure than the benefit of it to your soul or body, that draws you to it? Do you work so hard, or study so hard all the day besides, as to need so much recreation to refresh you?

§. 32. Quest. 3. Does not your conscience tell you, that if your sensual fantasy were but cured, it would be a more profitable recreation to your body or mind, to use some sober exercise for your body, which is confined to its proper limits of time; or to turn to a variety of labor, or studies, than to sit about these idle games?

§. 33. Quest. 4. Do you think that either Christ or his apostles used stage plays, cards or dice: or ever had such a frame of mind as to be addicted to them? Or was not David as wise as you, that took up his pleasure in the Word of God, and his melodious praise?

§. 34. Quest. 5. Does not your conscience tell you, that your delight is more in your plays and games than it is on God? And that these sports do no way increase your delight in God at all, but more unfit and undispose you? And yet every blessed man’s delight is in the law of the Lord, and in it he meditates day and night (Psalm 1:2). And do you do so?

§. 35. Quest. 6. Do you bestow as much time in praying and reading the Word of God, and meditating on it, as you do in your sports and recreations? No, do you not shuffle this over, and put God off with a few hypocritical heartless words, that you may be at your sports, or something which you love better?

§. 36. Quest. 7. Doesn’t your conscience tell you, that this precious time might be much better spent, in the works that God has appointed you to do? And that your sinful soul has need enough to spend it in far greater matters? Does it become one that has sinned so long, and is so unassured of pardon and salvation, and near another world, and so unready for it, to sit at cards or be hearing a stage play, when he should be making ready, and getting assurance of his peace with God.

§. 37. Quest. 8. Would you be found at cards, or plays when death comes to you? If it were this day, had you not rather be found about some holy, or some profitable labor?

§. 38. Quest. 9. Will it be more comfort to you when you are dying, to think of the time which you spent in cards, and plays, and vanity, or that which thou spent in serving God, and preparing for eternity?

§. 39. Quest. 10. Do you dare to pray to God to bless your cards, and dice, and plays to the good of your soul or body? Wouldn’t your conscience tell you, that this were but a mocking of God, as praying for that which you do not intend, and which your pleasures are unfit for? And yet no recreation is lawful, which you may not thus lawfully pray for a blessing on.

§. 40. Quest. 11. If you were sure yourselves that you sin not in your games, or sports, are you sure that your companions do not? That they have no lust or vanity of mind at stage plays, no covetousness, or sinful pleasure or passion at cards, or dice? If you say, “We are not bound to keep all other men from sin,” I answer, “You are bound to do your best towards it:” and you are bound not to contribute willingly to their sin: And you are bound to forbear a thing indifferent, though not a duty, to avoid the scandalizing or tempting of another. If Paul would never eat flesh while he lived rather than make a weak person offend, should not your sports be subject to just as much charity? He says, “It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy weak brother stumbles, or is offended, or made weak?” Object. Then we must give over our meat, and drink, and clothes, and all: Answ. It follows not that we must forsake our duty, to prevent another man’s sin, because we must forsake our pleasure in things indifferent: If you knew what sin is, and what it is to save or lose one’s soul, you would not make a sport of other mens’ sin, nor so easily contribute to their damnation, and think your sensual pleasure to be a good excuse. Romans 15:1-3: “In such cases, we that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak (that is, to be compassionate to them as we do children in their weakness) and not to please ourselves (to their hurt.) Let every one of us please his neighbor, for his good to edification (that is, prefer the edifying of another’s soul, before the pleasure of your bodies).” For even Christ pleased not himself—If Christ lost his life to save men from sin, will not you lose your sport for it?

§. 41. Quest 12. What kind of men are they that are most addicted to your games and plays? and what kind of men are they that avoid them, and are against them? Are there not more fornicators, drunkards, swearers, cursers, coveters of other men’s money, and profane neglecters of God and their souls, among gamblers and players, than among them that are against them? Judge by the fruits.

§. 42. And what I say to idle gamblers, is proportionably to be said to voluptuous youths; that run after wakes, and May games, and dances, and revellings, and are carried by the love of sports and pleasure, from the love of God, and the care of their salvation, and the love of holiness, and the love of their callings; and into idleness, riotousness and disobedience to their superiors: for the cure of this voluptuousness (besides what is said Chap. 4. Part 9.) Consider:

§. 43. 1. Do you not know that you have higher delights to mind? And are these toys becoming a noble soul, that has holy and heavenly matters to delight in?

§. 44. 2. Do you not feel what a plague the very pleasure is to your affections? How it bewitches you, and befools you, and makes you out of love with holiness, and unfit for anything that’s good?

§. 45. 3. Do you know the worth of those precious hours which you play away? Have you no more to do with them? Look inwards to your soul, and forward to eternity, and think of yourself better.

§. 46. 4. Is it sport that you need the most? Don’t you need more of Christ, and grace, and pardon, and preparation for death and judgment, and assurance of salvation? Why then are not these your business?

§. 47. 5. Have you not a God to obey and serve? And doesn’t he always see you? And will He not judge you? Alas, you know not how soon. Though you be now merry in your youth, and your heart cheer you, and you walk in the ways of your heart, and the sight of your eyes, yet know that for all these things God will bring you into judgment.

§. 48. 6. Observe in Scripture what God judges of your ways. Titus 3:3: “We ourselves were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving diverse lusts and pleasures.” 2 Timothy 2:22: “Flee youthful lusts but follow after righteousness, faith, charity, and peace with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.” Read 1 Peter 4:1-4; 2 Peter 3:3. 1 Timothy 3:4: “Lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God.”

§. 49. 7. You are but preparing for your future sorrow, either by repentance or destruction: And the greater is your pleasure now, the greater will be your sorrow and shame in the review.

Having spoken this much for the cure of sinful sports, I proceed to direct the more sober in their recreations.

§. 50. Direct. 2. When you understand the true nature and use of recreations, labor to be acquainted just how much, and what sort of recreation is needful to yourselves in particular. In which you must have respect 1. To your bodily strength, 2. To your minds, 3. To your labors. And when you have resolved on, what and how much is needful and fit, to help you in your duty, allow it its proper time and place, as you do your meals, and see that you don’t let it encroach upon your duty.

§. 51. Direct. 3. Ordinarily join profit and pleasure together that you lose no time. I know not one person of an hundred, or of many hundred, that needs any games at all: there are such variety of better exercises at hand to occupy them: and it is a sin to idle away any time, which we can better improve! I confess my own nature was as much addicted to playfulness as most: and my judgment allows me so much recreation as is needful to my health and labor (and no more): but for all that I find no need of any game to occupy me? When my mind needs recreation, I have variety of recreating books, and friends, and business to do that: and when my body needs it, the hardest Labor that I can bear is my best recreation: walking is instead of games and sports: as profitable to my body, and more to my mind: If I am alone, I may improve that time in meditation: If with others, I may improve it in profitable cheerful conference. I condemn not all sports or games in others, but I find none of them all to be best for myself: And when I observe how far the temper and life of Christ and his best servants was from such recreations, I avoid them with the more suspicion. And I see but few but distaste it in ministers (even shooting, bowling, and such more healthful games (to say nothing of chess and such other, as fit not the end of a recreation): Therefore there is somewhat in it that nature it self hath some suspicion of. That student that needs chess or cards to please his mind, I doubt has a carnal empty mind: If God and all his books, and all his friends, cannot suffice for this, there is some disease in it that should rather be cured than pleased. And for the body, it is another kind of exercise that profits it.

§. 52. Direct. 4. Watch against inordinate sensual delight, even in the most lawful sport: Excess of pleasure in any such vanity, does very much corrupt and befool the mind: It puts it out of relish with spiritual things; and turns it from God and Heaven and duty.

§. 53. Direct. 5. To this end keep a watch upon your thoughts and fantasies, that they run not after sports and pleasures. Else you will be like children that are thinking of their sport, and longing to be at it, when they should be at their books or business.

§. 54. Direct. 6. Avoid the company of partiers, gamblers and such time wasters. Come not among them, lest you be ensnared: Accompany yourselves with those that delight themselves in God, 2 Timothy 2:22.

§. 55. Direct. 7. Remember death and judgement, and the necessities of your souls. Usually these sports seem but foolishness to serious men: And they say of this mirth, as Solomon, it is madness: And it is great and serious subjects which makes serious men. Death and the world to come, when they are soberly thought on, do put the mind quite out of relish, with foolish pleasures.

§. 56. Direct. 8. Be painful in your honest callings. Laziness breeds a love of sports: when you must please your slothful flesh with ease, then it must be further pleased with vanities.

§. 57. Direct. 9. Delight in your relations and family duties and mercies. If you love the company and conversations with your parents, or children, or wives, or kindred as you ought, you will find more pleasure in talking with them about holy things or honest business, than in foolish sports. But adulterers that love not their wives, and unnatural parents and children that love not one another, and ungodly masters of families, that love not their duty, are put to seek their sport abroad.

§. 58. Direct. 10. See to the sanctifying of all your recreations: when you have chosen such as are truly suited to your need; and go not to them before you need, nor use them not beyond your need; see also that you lift up your hearts secretly to God, for his blessing on them; and mix them all along as far as you can with holy things; as with holy thoughts or holy speeches. As for music, which is a lawful pleasure, I have known some think it profane to use it privately or publicly with a Psalm, that scrupled not using it in common entertainment: When as all our entertainment should be as much sanctified as is possible: All should be done to the glory of God: And we have much more in Scripture for the holy use of music (public and private), than for any other use of it whatever. And it is the excellency of melody and music, that they are recreations which may be more aptly and profitably sanctified by application to holy uses, than any other. And I should think them little worth at all, if I might not use them for the holy exhilarating or elevating of my soul, or affecting it towards God, or exciting it to duty.

§. 59. Direct. 11. The sickly and the melancholy (who are usually least inclined to sports) have much more need of recreation than others, and therefore may allow it a much larger time than those that are in health and strength. Because they take it but as medicine to recover them to health, so to return again when they are recovered.

§. 60. Direct. 12. Be much more severe in regulating yourselves in your recreations, than in censuring others for using some sports which you mislike. For you know not perhaps their case, and reasons, and temptations: But an idle time wasting sensual sporter, every one should look on with pity as a miserable wretch.



UPDATE: 5/15/23

May be an image of text

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Biblical Economics 62: The Bible on Finances

DISCLAIMER

I am not a registered investment advisor with the SEC. Nothing in this video, should be taken as legally binding investment advice, in the same way that SEC licensed stockbrokers can advise their clients. I am not “selling” any stocks or OTC penny stocks as a broker in this video. The purpose of this video, is only to offer guidance to those who are interested in educating themselves, about self-directed investing and Biblically Responsible Investing (BRI).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment