15:00ff – While I disagree with his teaching against conditional security, I still think that his view of Calvinist lordship salvation eternal security (non-antinomian, non-hyper grace)–is a valid interpretation for honest-to-God, sincere, Bible obedient, heartfelt, puritanical, godly Calvinists. Its a totally valid point of view for God-fearing Calvinists: however, on an intellectual and theological level, I personally find this view Biblically unpersuasive when held up against the view taught as Wesleyan lordship salvation conditional security. –J.B.

—

J. Steven Harper and Steven Ashby’s Arminian views in Four Views on Eternal Security (Zondervan, 2002).

Randolph Foster, Objections to Calvinism As It Is (Schmul Publishing, 1998), ch. 6.

Thomas C. Oden, John Wesley’s Teachings, vol 2 (Zondervan, 2012), p. 184.